Scientific name
Trachelipus nodulosus
The sources do not describe uniform ecology: the German profile cites warm sites, while the Hungarian synthesis highlights meadows and qualifies the association with dry places. This difference must remain visible. [1][2]
Origin
A European species documented here by German and Hungarian sources; these two contexts do not constitute exhaustive mapping. [1][2]
- Open habitats
- Regional ecology
- Close to T. rathkii
Natural-history or taxonomic sources distinguished from breeding accounts; captive limits explicit.
At a glance
Regional descriptions of Trachelipus nodulosus differ: warm sites in Germany and meadows in the Hungarian source. [1][2]
| ADULT SIZE | 8–12 mm Bodentier⁴ natural-history reference. [1] |
|---|---|
| LIFESPAN | Not established No supported individual lifespan in the selected sources. |
| LIFESTYLE | Fast when disturbed Stones, wood and meadows depending on the region. [1][2] |
Adult size
8–12 mm in Bodentier⁴. [1]
Lifespan
No individual lifespan established through a cohort in the selected sources.
Lifestyle
An animal that moves quickly when disturbed; found beneath stones and wood, in meadows and some agricultural settings depending on the region. [1][2]
Housing
NATURAL ENVIRONMENT
Ground shelters — Natural environments described differently; no universal ‘very dry’ enclosure follows from them. [1][2]
No validated captive protocol adopted. Ecological divergence between sources makes a single ‘very dry’ enclosure instruction particularly inappropriate.
Care parameters
CAPTIVE CLIMATE
Not established — No validated husbandry range in the selected sources.
Humidity
Varied natural environments — Divergent regional sites and descriptions; no single captive target. [1][2]
Humidity
No universal target inferred Describe provenance and microshelter before interpreting needs.
Temperature
No captive range established ‘Warm site’ is a field description, not a heating setting.
Feeding
DIET AND CALCIUM
Dead plant matter, associated microorganisms and fungal filaments are described in the Hungarian source. No protein or calcium dosage established. [2]
Scope of this profile
Natural-history or taxonomic sources distinguished from breeding accounts; captive limits explicit.
Identification: examining the right details
The Hungarian profile specifies that the shape and position of pore fields on segment edges help separate the species from T. rathkii. [2] Bodentier⁴ also incorporates these characters into its key. [1] A generally brown, segmented appearance is therefore insufficient. Keep identification provisional if the details cannot be observed.
Two descriptions not to merge artificially
Bodentier⁴ mentions vineyards and the Kaiserstuhl, with animals beneath wood or stones. [1] The Hungarian profile mainly describes meadows and notes that very dry, hot ground is not characteristic in its context. [2] This information invites investigation of regional variation and microhabitat differences; it must not be averaged into a fictitious temperature.
Substrate, ventilation and husbandry caution
An exposed stone can shelter an underside very different from open air. For a natural-history log, record surface condition, ground contact and vegetation cover separately. The documents opened do not compare captive setups. The best-supported project remains observation in place; any culture must be described as local experience rather than a genus standard.
Diet and calcium
The Hungarian profile describes consumption of dead plant matter with associated microorganisms and fungal filaments. [2] It defines neither a protein-supplement amount nor a calcium dose. This supports an ecological reading of the soil rather than a supposedly complete vegetable menu. In records for an existing culture, note the nature and development of decaying matter as well as occasional additions.
Reproduction and young
No captive reproduction rate is proposed in the selected sources. Groups of small sizes can reflect several life stages or species; adult identification remains essential. Recording juvenile appearance alongside enclosure-intervention dates keeps observations usable without arbitrarily assigning a cause to every variation.
Monitoring and the main limit
The point requiring attention in this profile is habitat interpretation. A culture originating from a particular site should retain that provenance. Photographing characters, dating observations and describing the shelter help resolve a future discrepancy. There is no promise of hardiness, lifespan figure or conclusion that a European species tolerates every home climate here.
Checklist
- Keep regional context.
- Check pore fields if possible.
- Avoid the simplistic ‘dry and hot’ label.
Observations to record
- Provenance and shelter
- Identification photos
- Organic matter and life stages
The app provides individual animal records. Check which features are available for your animal in the released version.
Sources
Document-based overview; not a substitute for veterinary advice.
- Senckenberg / Bodentier⁴ — Trachelipus nodulosus
Source accessed - Kiss Magdolna / ENFO — Trachelipus nodulosus
Source accessed