Scientific name

Armadillidium versicolor

This European species appears in a study comparing water loss in several Armadillidium. This work does not provide a complete captive protocol. [1]

Origin

Southeastern Europe; the individuals studied in Hungary came, among other places, from a Danube site. [1]

  • Europe
  • Variable colours
  • Humid shelter

Experimental study used for its ecological limitations, not translated into a humidity target.

At a glance

A European species studied for water loss; laboratory experiments do not constitute terrarium settings [1].

DOCUMENTED SIZEUp to 15 mm
Descriptive value from Insektenliebe [2].
LIFESPANTo be documented
No supported individual lifespan in the selected sources.
LIFESTYLEGround-dwelling
Humid shelters and activity observed in captivity [2].

Adult size

Up to 15 mm at Insektenliebe; a descriptive breeding value. [2]

Lifespan

Individual lifespan is not established by the selected documents; no numerical value is extrapolated.

Lifestyle

Insektenliebe reports activity that is easy to observe and stresses maintaining humid shelters. The observation concerns its collection, not every wild population. [2]

Housing

SETUP AND SHELTERS

Soil and litter — Soil, leaves and wood in the commercial husbandry described; keep the enclosure layout documented [2].

Ventilated enclosure with food-providing soil, decaying hardwood and leaf cover; maintain moisture beneath shelters. [2]

Care parameters

BREEDER REFERENCE

21–25 °C — Insektenliebe account, not a validated optimum [2].

Humidity

Distinct zones — Accessible humid shelters and a less humid part in the cited practice [2].

Temperature

21–25 °C in Insektenliebe’s account [2] A practice value when attributed to a breeder; no universal safety threshold is inferred.

Humidity and ventilation

Accessible humid shelters and a less humid location [2] Examine substrate beneath shelters and record the enclosure’s actual conditions.

Feeding

DIET AND CALCIUM

Leaves, decaying wood and calcium, with limited supplements according to Insektenliebe [2].

Scope of this profile

Experimental study used for its ecological limitations, not translated into a humidity target.

Colour does not define a subspecies

The trade presents a ‘Slovenia’ lineage among others. [2] Keep this as declared provenance without automatically giving it taxonomic rank. A colony photo on arrival and the supplier’s identity form a useful starting point. Different colours alone cannot reconstruct crossings or the individuals’ geographical origin.

Choosing repeatable checks

Soil, leaves and wood are both habitat and resources. [2] Recording substrate depth, shelter locations and vent arrangement helps explain moisture retention. Prefer an accessible check point to repeated digging: monitoring should describe the environment used without reconstructing it on every visit.

Foods and calcium

The breeder consulted supplies leaves, decaying wood and calcium, with limited supplements. [2] Identifying the place where these are deposited allows leftovers to be observed. Entering additions and interventions in their actual order avoids attributing a behavioural change to a new food when it began before that food was offered.

What the water-loss study shows

The study compares species during limited experimental exposures; its conditions are not terrarium settings. [1] Above all, it recalls that two species in the same genus are not interchangeable. In the log, distinguish room temperature, temperature measured inside the enclosure and moisture observed beneath a hide: these observations answer different questions.

Tracking generations

The commercial account reports reproduction as possible, but no universal frequency is adopted. [2] Record the first observation of young and the persistence of small size classes. If the colony has just been split, keep the division date: visibility can change simply because animals have a new area and new shelters.

Risks of interpretation

A colourful, active species can attract overly frequent checks. Compare brief observations at similar times, then let the environment function. The selected data justify neither a target weight, a diagnosis based solely on immobility nor an acceptable mortality rate. If losses occur, document events and seek advice based on conditions actually recorded.

Checklist

  • Keep the group’s provenance and identification.
  • Prepare resources and shelters before arrival.
  • Define a simple check without regularly dismantling the environment.

Observations to record

  • Manual intervention log
  • Substrate and food condition
  • Young, moults and deaths observed

The app provides individual animal records. Check which features are available for your animal in the released version.

Sources

Document-based overview; not a substitute for veterinary advice.

  1. Csonka et al. (2018) — Morphological traits, desiccation resistance and habitat characteristics
    Source accessed
  2. Insektenliebe — Armadillidium versicolor
    Source accessed